Metareasoning for Multi-agent Epistemic Logics
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present an encoding of a sequent calculus for a multiagent epistemic logic in Athena, an interactive theorem proving system for many-sorted first-order logic. We then use Athena as a metalanguage in order to reason about the multi-agent logic an as object language. This facilitates theorem proving in the multi-agent logic in several ways. First, it lets us marshal the highly efficient theorem provers for classical first-order logic that are integrated with Athena for the purpose of doing proofs in the multi-agent logic. Second, unlike model-theoretic embeddings of modal logics into classical first-order logic, our proofs are directly convertible into native epistemic logic proofs. Third, because we are able to quantify over propositions and agents, we get much of the generality and power of higher-order logic even though we are in a firstorder setting. Finally, we are able to use Athena’s versatile tactics for proof automation in the multi-agent logic. We illustrate by developing a tactic for solving the generalized version of the wise men problem.
منابع مشابه
Epistemic coalition logic: completeness and complexity
Coalition logic is currently one of the most popular logics for multi-agent systems. While logics combining coalitional and epistemic operators have received considerable attention, completeness results for epistemic extensions of coalition logic have so far been missing. In this paper we provide several such results and proofs. We prove completeness for epistemic coalition logic with common kn...
متن کاملDynamic Epistemic Spatial Logic ∗
In this paper we combine features of dynamic-epistemic logics with the spatial logics in order to obtain a decidable, fully axiomatized logic for expressing information flow in distributed multi-agent systems. Thus, Dynamic Epistemic Spatial Logic is as an extension of Hennessy-Milner logic with spatial and epistemic operators.
متن کاملQuantified Epistemic Logics with Flexible Terms
We present a family of quantified epistemic logics for reasoning about knowledge in multi-agent systems. The language enjoys flexible terms with different denotations depending on the epistemic context in which they are interpreted. We present syntax and semantics of the language formally and show completeness of an axiomatisation. We discuss the expressive features of the language by means of ...
متن کاملGames and Logics of Knowledge for Multi-agent Systems
New types of knowledge constructions in epistemic logic are defined, whose semantics is given by a combination of game-theoretic notions and modal semantics. A new notion of knowledge introduced in this framework is focussed knowledge, which arises from the game-theoretic phenomenon of imperfect information in quantified versions of epistemic logics. This notion is shown to be useful in knowled...
متن کاملComparing Semantics of Logics for Multi-Agent Systems
We draw parallels between several closely related logics that combine – in different proportions – elements of game theory, computation tree logics, and epistemic logics to reason about agents and their abilities. These are: the coalition game logics CL and ECL introduced by Pauly in 2000, the alternating-time temporal logic ATL developed by Alur, Henzinger and Kupferman between 1997 and 2002, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004